Well, here goes nothin'
Ok, your movie first:
Not particularly good as far as flash movies go. Slideshows are usually deleted not for being against the NG submission rules, but just because they generally take no effort to produce, and are also rarely entertaining. This was certainly no exception. The graphics were used well to get your point across, although I would give point had any of them been your own.
Now for your political opinion:
You think abortion is wrong. Thats OK, believe me. But what isn't OK is forcing your opinion on to other people. We don't need propaganda that shows us the "horrors of abortion" or somesuch. If you think abortion is wrong, simply don't get an abortion. But just because you think abortion is morally wrong it doesn't give you the right to force others to follow your moral path.
The Supreme Court legalized abortion. I think it should stay that way. America is all about protecting the rights of its people. A fetus is not a person. Its developing into one, sure, but it still isn't a person.
Perhaps we should assume that your argument is completely valid. Following that same reasoning, eggs can't be eaten, meat can't be eaten, humans would not be able to eat at all, for whenever we do we would be unfairly ending life, be it plant, animal, whatever.
I am pro-choice. Yea, it kind of sucks to not be alive, but it also kind of sucks to not have a choice. Allowing women the right to choose is essential, because it allows for those who feel their morals don't allow them to do such a thing not to, and those who feel like that is an option to persue it. I'm not a woman, the choice isn't up to me, that is why I would never support anything that would subtract from a woman's right to choose. The problem is that people generally assume that pro-choice is the same as pro-abortion, which is ridiculous. Nobody in their right mind would ever want everyone who could get an abortion to get one.
Pro-choice means, in my case, that I am simply willing to allow a decision to be made by someone other than myself, and I admit that I am not qualified enough to forbid such a decision. Not a single person is qualified to make such a call when it comes to revoking a decision from someone. While I encourage a reply to this review (the choice is yours), I don't really want to read it if you choose to label me based on my stance. (the obvious exception being "pro-choice")
</essay>